Although human rights are commonly glorified in North America, they do have a less publicized negativity associated with them. Starting this course off in September, I had only ever been taught about the inherent goodness of the concept of human rights. After all, how could bad be associated with something everyone strives to defend? Slowly throughout the course I have come to realize that human rights are a relatively new concept written in charters by developed nations of the West. More importantly, human rights declared in international documents seem to mostly be the result of abuses rather than preventative of said abuses. Human rights have even been manipulated by developed nations as an excuse to hypocritically invade a nation in the name of human rights. However, intervening nations often have other agendas.
Even with all of these ways in which human rights are limited and can be manipulated, I still believe human rights are needed. Human rights declared on an international level publicly acknowledge that all members of the human race are equal with equal rights. Although the enforcement and realization of these rights may not be equivalent based on the political rule one lives under, there is still the necessity of having human rights as a tangible, real thing to potentially claim or refer to. Human rights unify us in our hope for better treatment for all. They provide guideline, or “golden rule,” for how people should be treated. They serve as a claim for a marginalized individual or a group to address the international press and community for help when governments are not protecting the rights of its citizens. Internationally declared human rights also support social justice activists on a global level. Overall, human rights discourse does have its limitations, but the hope and the promise these rights provide make them far from useless.
